Some development shops have macros that set up CALL parameter lists in a particular area. Or maybe you've done that yourself. It's tempting to use that area for parameters passed to an attached program (PARAM, MF=(E,area)). However, if the attaching program uses this area again before your attached program has a chance to get it, the attached program will pick up whatever is there. So the pointer you expect , maybe to a program communications vector table, may wind up being something completely different, say a log process block. The famous IBM line "unpredictable results will occur" becomes prophetic. In my case, it was an S052-0101 error, which is a problem with LXRES. Now my PC was not executing LXRES, but because the loaded address came from not the expected area, whatever garbage was picked up was identical to LXRES.
The official blog of Cat Herder Software, LLC. News, comments, opinion, and experiences, not just of the mainframe.
25 June 2013
Pitfalls of reusing storage with ATTACH(X)
So here's a little something that bit me, and it's something that I know, and has bit me before. Be careful if you reuse storage.
22 April 2013
A little caveat if you are playing with DCB= on LINK/LOAD
So, as we all remember, you can specify a DCB address for LINK/LOAD, which is an open BPAM DCB pointing at a PDS concatenation from which CSV looks for the requested load module. This makes LINK/LOAD (and CSVDYLPA) flexible and can help with debugging or a quick, temporary override.
Unfortunately, if you specify DCB=(r) and that register does not point to a DCB, you don't get a fancy return code saying the DCB was not a DCB. No, what you will probably get is a strange S0C4-0011 in CSVGETMD in the nucleus.
Moral of the story: if you are cloning code, and you use lots of register operands in your macro invocations, make sure you load all the registers.
Note: CSVDYLPA has additional checks on the DCB parameter and it will give return and reason codes.
Unfortunately, if you specify DCB=(r) and that register does not point to a DCB, you don't get a fancy return code saying the DCB was not a DCB. No, what you will probably get is a strange S0C4-0011 in CSVGETMD in the nucleus.
Moral of the story: if you are cloning code, and you use lots of register operands in your macro invocations, make sure you load all the registers.
Note: CSVDYLPA has additional checks on the DCB parameter and it will give return and reason codes.
12 March 2013
Wrapping your own macro code around vendor-supplied macros without changing source
One of the great IBM z/OS performance and measurement gurus, Martin Packer, made a comment in a recent blog entry about he wished he could wrap his code around macros supplied from an external source. I told him that this was possible, and that I had recently done this with the IBM High Level Assembler Toolkit structured programming macros. In this case, I added support for using just name or !name for testing a bit flag in conjunction with a bit-flag-generating macro. The key is the OPSYN assembler command.
I will demonstrate how to do this using something I wish the DCB macro had that its ACB sibling has - the ability to use the label field as the default DDNAME=.
I apologize in advance for the crappy formatting; I still need to come up with some good formatting for the examples. Google's default doesn't do well. (Martin, yes, I still have your email with suggestions. :) )
I will create CHS.MACLIB(DCB), which will call SYS1.MACLIB(DCB).
First, we clone the DCB prototype:
MACRO
&NAME DCB &DDNAME=0,&MACRF=, FOUNDATION BLOCK*
&BFTEK=,&BFALN=,&EODAD=1,&RECFM=,&EXLST=0, EXTENSION*
Snipped rest of prototype
And then we add our logic:
PUSH PRINT,NOPRINT Obfuscate
PRINT OFF,NOPRINT
DCB_ OPSYN DCB Change CHS.MACLIB(DCB)'s name
DCB OPSYN , DCB now refers to SYS1.MACLIB(DCB)
POP PRINT,NOPRINT No more obfuscation
LCLC &N
&N SETC '&DDNAME'
AIF ('&N' NE '').GOTDD
&N SETC '&NAME'
AIF ('&N' NE '').GOTDD
MNOTE 8,'Missing label or DDNAME'
AGO .EXIT
.*
.GOTDD ANOP ,
&NAME DCB DDNAME=&N,MACRF=&MACRF,BFTEK=&BFTEK,BFALN=&BFALN, &
EODAD=&EODAD,RECFM=&RECFM,EXLST=&EXLST, &
Snipped rest of invocation
.EXIT ANOP ,
PUSH PRINT,NOPRINT Obfuscate again
PRINT OFF,NOPRINT
DCB OPSYN DCB_ Now DCB refers to CHS.MACLIB(DCB)
POP PRINT,NOPRINT No more obfuscation (again)
MEND
The magic is in the OPSYN assembler instructions. Assuming CHS.MACLIB is ahead of SYS1.MACLIB in the SYSLIB concatenation, our DCB macro is picked up first. During processing, we change the name of our DCB macro to DCB_, and then we tell the assembler that DCB from this point forward refers to whichever DCB it finds. Since our DCB is now DCB_, the assembler now burrows further into the concatenation and finds SYS1.MACLIB(DCB) when it gets to the DCB macro coded inside CHS.MACLIB(DCB), and the assembler now uses it. After the DCB invocation, OPSYN is used again to undo what we did at the beginning, so that subsequent invocations of DCB will use CHS.MACLIB(DCB).
It's a little bit confusing at first, but if you stick an MNOTE in your wrapper macro, or use MHELP and ACONTROL LIBMAC, you can see what the assembler is doing. And you'll find this can be a very powerful tool for certain situations, such as prohibiting usage of certain macro operands by developers.
It's a little bit confusing at first, but if you stick an MNOTE in your wrapper macro, or use MHELP and ACONTROL LIBMAC, you can see what the assembler is doing. And you'll find this can be a very powerful tool for certain situations, such as prohibiting usage of certain macro operands by developers.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)