High half register check
Can't use those bitchin' new high-half register instructions because you have customers not on the latest z196/z114? Need to check the upper half of a register for non-zero so your AMODE 64 doesn't run amok? Use the following:CLG R0,=X'00000000FFFFFFFF'And you also have an example of a label longer than 8 characters.
JH THERE_IS_SOMETHING_IN_THE_HIGH_HALF_OF_THE_REGISTER
Make sure your base register is clean in AR mode
LAE is a nice instruction for setting a base register if you aren't sure your code will be called in primary or AR mode. If the B2 field is 0, when you are in AR mode, 00000000 is placed into the corresponding R1 access register, so you can codeLAE R12,0(R15)
and get your entry point without the possibility of getting messed up by a stray ALET in AR12.
WAIT LONG=YES and baseless programming (z/OS, 1.12 and earlier)
If you've tried this combination before, you've gotten bit because the macro generates a BCR GPR8,0 instruction followed by an ICM of the second byte via an "*-1" operand. If you're baseless, this fails because you are baseless. However, there is no need to fret. The following code works and gets around this issue.
IILH GPR0,X'8000'
IILL GPR0,1
WAIT (0),ECB=MYECB
The macro generates an unnecessary LR GPR0,GPR0 followed by the appropriate code. If you are using an ECBLIST, just put the number of this-many-POSTed ECBs in GPR0; in this case, it might be easier to load GPR0 first, then use an OILH GPR0,X'8000' instruction.
As noted in the comments below, starting with 1.13, if you are SYSSTATE ARCHLVL=2, WAIT will generate appropriate code for baseless situations.
As noted in the comments below, starting with 1.13, if you are SYSSTATE ARCHLVL=2, WAIT will generate appropriate code for baseless situations.
If you have done SYSSTATE ARCHLVL=2
ReplyDeletethen the z/OS 1.13 version of the WAIT macro will generate code which does not require a base register.
Jim Mulder
What took so long? :D
DeleteAs you can surmise, I'm working in an environment that is < 1.13. We have 1.13 in house but on our sandbox system. I've taken a look at the macro source and I like what I see.
Jim, I really appreciate that you look at this little ol' blog here and take the time to comment on it.
I try never to be baseless. :)
ReplyDeleteThe second operand of the CLG (for content checking in high half) is easier to decipher with =F'0,-1' or use CLG R0,=A(1,0) and JNL.
ReplyDelete